WhatIsAGoodMother Survey 《什麼是好媽媽》民調
Published on
Modified on
You can help us reach 1,200 responses!
你可以幫助我們達到 1,200 個回應！
Research Purpose
The WhatIsAGoodMother Survey intends to investigate people’s opinion on what they think a “good mother” is like.
Through the WIAGM Survey, as a respondent, you can express your unique views through, first, writing a short description (in an unlimited number of words and in whatever language you prefer). Next, you are to fill out 12 demographic items. Third, you rate 21 context items on a scale from 1 to 4 on your experience with your mother during your teenage years. All together, the survey takes about 3 minutes to fill out.
Background
Parenting literature informs us that authoritative parenting style (high in warmth and high in strictness) and indulgent parenting style (high in warmth and low in strictness) are the two most optimal parenting styles–sharing a common value of high in parental warmth–that can bring out the most optimal child outcomes (e.g., Darling & Steinberg, 1993; Garcia & Serra, 2019; Rohner, 2021). Specifically, indulgent parenting style (high in warmth and low in strictness) edges over authoritative parenting style (high in warmth and high in strictness) in fostering higher empathetic ability in children and teenagers as well as long-term emotionally stability (e.g., immunity against depression and anxiety) from teenage-hood to older adulthood (Garcia & Serra, 2019). In short, parental warmth is the key to psychologically well-adjusted children, teenagers, and young-to-old adults (confirmed by Rohner, 2021).
Research Questions
Yet, beyond what is being measured by the parental warmth scale and their items, are there other experiences that a mother can bring that is contributing to the “warmth” described in the literature? In other words, what do adult children feel that their mother has done right to them? Or, what do adult children feel that their mother could have done better to them? What do they think that they have missed or lost due to their mother?
And, Do people’s experience corroborates with what the theory predicts? What insights can people bring to this line of research?
Goals of Data Collection
In the first phase of this project, we aim to obtain 200 responses per age group to understand patterns across life stages:
- adolescents (age 12-17)
- young adults (age 18-35)
- middle-aged adults (age 36-59)
- young older adults (age 60-74)
- middle older adults (age 75-84)
- old older adults (age 85+)
We aim to utilize both quantitative and qualitative data to develop a model that can illustrate the relationships between the six dimensions of parenting style and adolescent/adult outcomes extracted from the demographic data.
Disclaimer: Confidentiality is strictly honored and administered. All information and psychoeducational materials published by Hoideology.com on this website or YouTube Channel is based on existing cases that have been already published elsewhere in the scientific communities (e.g., journal articles), books, news, or other websites and YouTube channels, with citation of references in the APA (American Psychological Association) format. No individual clients’ cases, data, or information are or will be used, mentioned, or cited here or elsewhere.
《什麼是好媽媽》問卷旨在調查人們對「好媽媽」的看法。 透過 WhatIsAGoodMother 問卷，作為受訪者，你可以透過撰寫簡短的描述（字數不限，語言隨意）來表達你獨特的觀點。接下來，你將看到 12 個人口統計問題，用於觀察你的國籍以及你對與媽媽相處經歷的相關因素。接下來，你需要使用 21 個情境問題（從 1 到 4 的等級）來評估您過去青少年時期與媽媽相處的經驗。總共只需 3 分鐘即可完成此調查。
研究目的
背景
教養文獻告訴我們，權威型教養方式（高溫暖、高嚴格）和溺愛型教養方式（高溫暖、低嚴格）是兩種最理想的教養方式（高溫暖、高嚴格）和溺愛型教養方式（高溫暖、低嚴格）是兩種最理想的教養方式——它們都具有高父母溫暖的共同點——能夠帶來最理想的兒童發展結果（例如，Darling & Steinberg，1993；Garcia & Serra，2019；Rohner，2019；Rohner，2019；Rohner，2019；Rohner，2019；Rohner，2019；Rohner，2019；Rohner，2021）。具體而言，溺愛型教養方式（高溫暖、低嚴格）在培養兒童和青少年更高的同理心能力以及從青少年期到成年期的長期情緒穩定性（例如，對抑鬱和焦慮的免疫力）方面優於權威型教養方式（Garcia & Serra，2019）。簡而言之，父母的溫暖是兒童、青少年和年輕人到老年人心理適應良好的關鍵（Rohner，2021 年證實）。
研究問題
然而，除了父母溫暖量表及其條目所衡量的內容之外，母親是否還有其他經驗能夠促成文獻中所描述的「溫暖」？換句話說，成年子女認為母親對他們做了哪些正確的事？或者，成年子女認為母親本來可以對他們做得更好嗎？他們認為自己因為母親而錯過了什麼或失去了什麼？ 人們的體驗是否與該理論的預測相符？人們能為這方面的研究帶來哪些見解？
目標
在本計畫的第一階段，我們計劃在每個年齡層收集 200 份回應：
- 青少年（12-17 歲）
- 年輕人（18-35 歲）
- 中年人（36-59 歲）
- 年輕老年人（60-74 歲）
- 中老年人（75-84 歲）
- 最老老年人（85 歲以上）
我們的目標是利用量性和質性資料來開發一個模型，該模型可以說明從人口統計中提取的教養方式的六個維度與青少年/成人結果之間的關係。
聲明：我們嚴格遵守和執行保密原則。 在本網站或其頻道所談論和引用的所有資訊、案例和心理教育資料均已經在科學界的平台（例如期刊文章）、書籍、新聞或其他網站和 YouTube 頻道被發表過，並有 APA（美國心理學會）格式引用參考文獻。我們絕不會談論和引用任何個別/個人客戶的案例、資料或資訊在本網站的媒體或其他地方。
Hoideology 